Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 5:04 pm
  The report is available at this link, and here is how it is described: In response to a suggestion in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:59 am by Marcela Knaup
Supreme Court ruled that an Arizona law that sanctions businesses for hiring undocumented workers is legal (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:03 pm
I am not sure that this is a desirable outcome: When national mass-mail outfits (NARAL, the NRA, etc) battle it out in a state, the states are arguably transformed into echo chambers for D.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 4:53 am
Readers of MassTortDefense may recall that in 2007, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
" In addition to detailed coverage of the arguments, this article also notes that Cuellar's staff includes three permanent research attorneys: Richard Rochman (from Baxter's chambers), Victor Rodriguez (from Corrigan's chambers), and Aileen McGrath (former law clerk to SCOTUS Justice Breyer) -- and two annual clerks: Phil Brest and Emily Curran (a former law clerk for the 7th Cir.'s Diane Wood and USDJ Koh).Today's DJ also presents an appellate article… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:14 am
Related posts Thoughts on the Decision in Chambers v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 5:22 am
The Commission concluded that when a public official uses State aircraft for State and non-State travel, the following requirements must be met: (i) there must be a bona fide State purpose for the trip; (ii) the State purpose must be the primary reason for the trip; (iii) the public official must make an accurate apportionment of the time spent between State and non-State business and promptly reimburse the State for… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:39 am by tracey
The Court of Appeal so stated when allowing the appeal of Essex County Council against a decision of Judge Jacobs in the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) on 8 March 2010 setting aside a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) of 8 September 2009 that it was no longer necessary to maintain the statement of special educational needs of MW (now aged 22 years), the daughter of the claimant, Antony John Williams.” WLR… [read post]