Search for: "Childs F. Burden" Results 201 - 220 of 1,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2021, 7:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
De La Roca, 910 F.3d 92, 96 (3d Cir. 2018) The District Court determined that Appellee met this burden. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In addition to reinforcing the parent/child hierarchy, this setup gives parents the power to leverage the item for which the child needs consent to extract behavioral conformity from the child. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Ferber (the child pornography case) suggests, when a ban is focused almost exclusively on constitutionally valueless speech, an exception for valuable speech would suffice to keep the ban constitutional. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
(Domestic Relations Law § 76–f [2][a]-[h] ). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Legal abortion obviously conveys a “benefit” in a comparative sense: not abortion as an absolute good but legal abortion as compared to a back-alley butcher or to state-enforced child-bearing. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
” Brenda contended Ryan’s allegations “fail[ed] to meet the high burden required for a change of custody” because none of them, “even if true, constitute[d] a material and substantial change in circumstances. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
” ¶10 Because Harper “failed to establish that a material, substantial change of circumstances has occurred which would justify setting aside the conclusion of [the court] from 2012,” the court concluded that “[f]urther consideration of [Child’s] best interests is therefore not possible under Utah law. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am by SHG
Stevens, 533 F.3d 218, 232–35 (3d Cir. 2008) (deciding the constitutionality of a dog-fighting statute on strict scrutiny grounds alone). [read post]
Wallace Tashima, who was himself imprisoned as a child in a WWII-era Japanese internment camp, said he sided with the Oregon Court. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
Castanos has acknowledged EICB as his daughter since she was three months old, and he has reliably provided child support and had regular contact with her since then, making several visits a year to Chile. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
After doing so, it decided that Colin, as petitioner, did not meet his burden of establishing habitual residency. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court determined that the husband’s various submissions denying a sexual relationship with R.L. were “conclusory and self-serving,” and, failed to meet his prima facie burden on summary judgment. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant was convicted of two counts of sexual offense with a child by an adult, rape of a child, first-degree kidnapping, and two counts of taking indecent liberties with a child in Wake County, stemming from the assault of a six-year-old child at a church. (1) In regard to one of the indecent liberties convictions, the defendant argued that the State did not present sufficient evidence that the defendant acted inappropriately when touching the… [read post]