Search for: "Citibank v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 10:43 am by webmaster
§ 21 et seq.) and the complex interplay between federal and state regulation of banks. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
Citibank, has been settled and dismissed. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
In December 2008, the law firm sued the bank in state court. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm by Dan Bushell
" The Third District stated: In the instant case, without rehashing the facts set forth in this opinion, it is clear that Citibank failed to properly serve Jade Winds’ counsel with the Second Motion to Cancel and failed to notify counsel of the hearing. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
” According to records obtained from Missouri’s Secretary of State, the St. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am by Beth Graham
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stok & Associates PA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:15 am by Adam Schlossman
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Citibank v Plapinger, 66 NY2d 90 (1985); Red Tulip LLC v Neiva, 44 AD3d 204, 209-10 (1st Dept 2007). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Antitrust Today
  The District Court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims under the rule of Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]