Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 201 - 220
of 366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
(Liebert Cassidy Whitmore prepared an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court in the Long Beach case on behalf of the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs.) [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
The California Supreme Court has issued its decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:06 am
City of Los Angeles, et al., Riverside County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Thank you to Erich Shiners of Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai LLP, my colleague on the State Bar Labor and Employment Law Executive Committee, for pointing out that the California Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:05 am
City of Los Angeles (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 757.Bruce Furtado worked for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation as a correctional lieutenant. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
(lead case), Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles and ECUSA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 6:04 pm
Review Granted City of Hayward v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
City of Los Angeles, 155 Cal. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Earlier this year in City of Livermore v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
City of Los Angeles, Case No. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 7:45 pm
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court case no. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:58 pm
The district court dismissed the suit, concluding that our decision in Huppert v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:37 am
City of Pittsburg, which the Court now was required to follow. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 am
Superior Court, 51 Cal.2d 423, 433 (1959). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
That case is County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
’” Copeland at 1256 (quoting City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
