Search for: "Clark v. Judge" Results 201 - 220 of 2,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
: on the recent decisions in Onuoha v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust and Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Clark’s conduct in late 2020 and early 2021 was also the focus of a hearing by the House committee probing the January 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:20 pm by Benjamin Pollard
The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
  Perhaps perversely, with the near total abolition of jury trials in defamation cases, lawyers (whether this be the parties’ representatives or the judge) must assume the role of the hypothetical ‘ordinary reasonable reader’ who is “not naÏve”, “unduly suspicious” or “avid for scandal” (Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 130 per Sir Anthony Clarke MR at [14]). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm by Giles Peaker
I agree therefore with Mr Clarke that no proper basis is identified or explained in this decision for fixing Mr Brem with liability – either for breach of covenant or in tort. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
17 May 2022, 1:28 am by INFORRM
Generally they identify the court, the judge who will be sitting there that day, and one or more cases to be heard. [read post]