Search for: "Coca Cola Bottling Company"
Results 201 - 220
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 88 Ga.App. 241, 246, 76 S.E.2d 408 (1953), a case which closely parallels the facts here. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:06 am
In 2003, a third-party marketing company produced, at Pom’s request, a document describing the results of focus group research relating to Pom's products. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 2:50 pm
For example, Coca-Cola’s bottle shape, Tiffany’s blue colored box and the Microsoft boot up sounds are trademarks that identify the company behind the product or service. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 2:50 pm
For example, Coca-Cola’s bottle shape, Tiffany’s blue colored box and the Microsoft boot up sounds are trademarks that identify the company behind the product or service. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:29 pm
Trademarks can protect: words (iPad); symbols and logos (the Nike swoosh); design (Mickey Mouse character); slogans (I’m Lovin’ It); sounds (MGM Roaring Lion sound, Nokia tune); the non-functional shape of the productor its packaging (Coca-Cola bottle); colour (Magenta color registered by T-Mobile). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:14 am
Other things besides words can serve as trademarks: the shape of a product or container (think the classic Coca-Cola bottle); the color of a product (think Owens-Corning's pink building insulation); even sounds (think the NBC television chimes). [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:20 pm
The Coca-Cola bottle should be protected against dilution by sales of salad oil in imitation bottles; but the retailers were adamant that they needed protection for their lookalike businesses. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
" Don't ask your PepsiCo client for a reference over at Coca-Cola. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:36 pm
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2001). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Cases R 785/2014-4, R 1014/2014-4, R 1015/2014-4 and Case R 2387/2013-4Contrast unlucky Out Fit 7 with the treatment received by Tattiemoon and The Fred Rogers Company. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:35 pm
And if so, does the Constitution preclude deploying that law against the company for activity that bears some significant relationship to publication? [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
In M/S Gujarat Bottling Co. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:42 am
In September 2012, a local newspaper article included photos of the then-current version of a Shorebilly Brewing Company t-shirt and Shorebilly Brewery beer bottles and growlers (containers with beer produced on site that customers are allowed to take out). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:15 pm
The S.D.N.Y. also dismissed a putative class action filed against The Coca-Cola Company, alleging that its Gold Peak® “Slightly Sweet” tea leads consumers to believe the beverage was low in sugar and calories when, in fact, sugar is the second most predominant ingredient. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:02 pm
Guggenheim also accompanied representatives from Mars candy when the company wanted faster approval processes for food additives and held telephone calls with FDA about “bottled water labeling,” among other client needs. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:42 am
In Gujarat Bottling Company Limited v Coca Cola Company (AIR (1995) Supreme Court 237), the Supreme Court of India held: "Since the negative stipulation in ... the . . . [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
Helm reminded me of my grandfather; of feeding hay to the cattle from the back of a red ’52 Ford tractor as a kid; and of driving the back mountain roads of North Carolina in July in search of a cold bottle of Coca-Cola from the cooler on a general store’s porch. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:44 am
Launched early in 1985, this new formulation of Coca-Cola was designed to replace the original formulation and initially did well in the US. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:08 pm
And that evaluation can be made at each stage of examination.If the broadest claims are patentable and unassailable, then we may not need to worry about any of the narrower dependent claims (and whether they include very narrow limitations, such as requiring an imprint of Tickle-Me-Elmo riding a bicycle and drinking a bottle of Coca-Cola on a face of the brick), though in most cases, it is advantageous to keep narrower claims (assuming they are not ridiculous like the… [read post]
