Search for: "Coca v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
Coca-Cola Bottling Co., must have rolled in their graves. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:40 pm
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:05 am
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, No. 13-56126; and Sierra v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
Whether the same can be said for FIFA's major sponsors over the years, which include Nike, Coca-Cola, Visa and McDonalds, Gazprom, Hyandai, Kia and Adidas, remains to be seen. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:38 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The functionality of hashtags was introduced by Twitter but has since been extended to other social media platforms, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest (to name a few), and the to blogosphere as a whole.Against this backdrop, it is instructive to consider two recent trade mark applications filed in the United States by the Coca Cola Company for 'soft drinks' in class 32, #cokecanpics TM no. 86480497 and #smilewithacoke TM no. 86480495. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* BREAKING: CJEU says that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive but Member States can protect themHere's another insightful take by Eleonora on the surreal CJEU decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment, a reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly hyperlink-loving Member State, Sweden, which was supposed to address linking and copyright. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 134 S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 12:56 pm
United States of America La Sra. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
This morning the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) gave its ruling in Case T‑250/13 Naazneen Investments Ltd v OHIM, Energy Brands, Inc. intervening. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Inc v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Inc v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:26 am
” See Pom v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:42 am
Teal Bay Alliances, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:37 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
