Search for: "Cohen v. Attorney General"
Results 201 - 220
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
The post Federal Trade Commission Slams Homeopathic Drugs appeared first on Michael H Cohen Law Group | Healthcare Lawyers | Life Sciences | FDA & FTC Law. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
The post Federal Trade Commission Slams Homeopathic Drugs appeared first on Michael H Cohen Law Group | Healthcare Lawyers | Life Sciences | FDA & FTC Law. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
The post Federal Trade Commission Slams Homeopathic Drug appeared first on Michael H Cohen Law Group | Healthcare Lawyer | Life Sciences | FDA & FTC Law. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
Cohen v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 6:58 pm
Cohen [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
Greenwire’s Lawrence Hurley profiles Damien Schiff, the Pacific Legal Foundation attorney who argued and won last Term’s Sackett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
DANIEL MARK COHEN, Respondent. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Ambulatory surgery centers are generally more convenient for patients. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:18 am
Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
” [Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Riley v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
The limitations period, however, may be tolled where there is a continuing attorney-client relationship pertaining specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001 ]), and where there was “a mutual understanding of need for further services in connection with that same subject matter” (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
The limitations period, however, may be tolled where there is a continuing attorney-client relationship pertaining specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001 ]), and where there was “a mutual understanding of need for further services in connection with that same subject matter” (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st… [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
For example, in a ruling last month by a district court in the City of Chicago’s challenge to Attorney General Sessions’ insistence that Chicago comply with § 1367, the court conceived of the inquiry into § 1373’s constitutionality as follows: [The AG’s insistence on] compliance [with § 1373] must be proper under the Spending Clause, and 1373 must pass constitutional muster [under the Printz analysis.] [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:50 pm
” Id.; see also Cohen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
” At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen urges the Court to grant review in the case of an Alabama death-row inmate in whose case a judge adopted verbatim the proposed opinion written by the Alabama attorney general’s office. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze the essential issues raised in Spokeo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
See Clark v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
