Search for: "Commons v. Ellis" Results 201 - 220 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 9:43 am by Howard Friedman
It also rejected a retaliation claim regarding prayer oil pricing.In Ellis v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
Kirkland & Ellis, LLP (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Request for sales and customer information for accused product creates actual controversy sufficient to support declaratory relief claim: Triteq Lock & Security, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
These are especially common in the field of drugs. . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
The rights that burglars enjoy have long been part of the fabric of English common law. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:57 am by Don Cruse
Burden of proof in arbitration enforcement: Veronica Ellis and Pacesetter Builders, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker Pacesetter Steel Realtors v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Bexis
  We of course like preemption, but after our side lost Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:53 am by Adam Baker
In particular, the basic framework of bidding and tendering law in Canada was set out in a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1981 which fundamentally altered the common law of contracts as it had previously applied to analysis of tendered contracts. [read post]