Search for: "Commonwealth v. Young, V." Results 201 - 220 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm by Stephen Griffin
  This means I am critical of views such as those propounded long ago by Karl Llewellyn and by Ernest Young and Adrian Vermeule in the present that seem to do this, particularly by appealing to British or Commonwealth traditions of the “unwritten” constitution and constitutional “conventions. [read post]
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts also filed a lawsuit against ExxonMobil. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:57 am
Victims and witnesses may refuse to come forward to testify, particularly when the victim is young. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm by Dan Ernst
The Fund was created in October 1918 by the widow of Stephen V. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am by Ray Dowd
A former concert pianist, David sits on the board of Astral Artistic Services, an organization dedicated to advancing the careers of young concert musicians. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm by The Charge
  Reaffirming the rebuttable presumption of propriety for peremptory challenges, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]