Search for: "Coney v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm
For example, Justice Souter quite clearly stated that one of the reasons leading him to resign was because he did not like living in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:58 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts offered hope to both sides. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:58 am
Her opinion followed directly in the line of a similar decision written last year by Justice Amy Coney Barrett in Boechler v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
Wil Wilkins, one of the plaintiffs in Wilkins v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:25 am
ShareBoth oral advocates faced fairly cold receptions on Monday morning in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
I would state the issue a bit differently. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:15 pm
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
More recently, the court in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:19 am
In Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
This issue came up in a little reported exchange in the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: JUSTICE BARRETT: One question. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
“Amy Coney Barrett Thinks the Constitution Is Optional For State Courts; Her dissent in Cruz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm
Conservative Amy Coney Barrett may also agree with it. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:14 pm
ShareIn many ways, Monday’s oral argument in Dubin v. [read post]