Search for: "Cool v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:52 am by Charlotte Garden
That protocol generally calls upon each of 71 signatory nations, including the United States and Canada, to establish a “Central Authority” to serve documents and provide proof of service. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am by Peter Margulies
This subsection’s language permits return to “contiguous” countries that share a border with the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982) which held the 29 USC 216 controls settlements on this type of case, and allows only Court approved or Department of Labor approved cases. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:40 am by Jason Mazzone
The bulk of commentary from legal academics on President Trump's Executive Order concerning admission of non-citizens into the United States has involved creative advocacy rather than useful analysis. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
Baer, 973 P.2d 1225, 1231 (Colo. 1999).In the Interest of R.D., supra.The court then took up the First Amendment issue, explaining that theFirst Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And the list that the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) was hoping to end up on didn’t belong to Santa but to SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]