Search for: "Costco Wholesale Corp. " Results 201 - 220 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 6:00 am
Costco Wholesale Corp., 171 Cal.App.4th 1, 22  (Feb. 11, 2009) (same). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:03 pm by Adriene Cooper
  The session will be moderated by Craig Wilson, vice president and GMM for Costco Wholesale Corp. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:47 am
Siltronic, the city's top non-wholesale customer, paid $.003227 a gallon -- again, five times what Carollo paid. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Mark Theodore
  In Costco Wholesale Corp. 358 NLRB No. 106 (September 7, 2012).pdf the Board found some provisions of the employer’s handbook to be violative of the Act. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
Crystal Import Corp (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Safe Skies - ITC decides not to review initial determination in certain dual access locks (337-TA-689) (ITC 377 Law Blog) Toyota - In hybrid patent case, Toyota argues preclusion to avoid exclusion (Green Patent Blog)   US Copyright The impact of eBay on injunctive relief in copyright cases (Copyrights & Campaigns) The Copyright Act’s registration requirement no longer… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:58 am by Zak Gowen
In a joint stipulation filed by Costco Wholesale Corp. and the defendants, including Visa Inc., Mastercard Inc., Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co., the parties told the court that the wholesale retailer “fully settled all of its claims against all of the defendants” but did not disclose details of the deal. . . . [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:23 am by Anna Armstrong
In a joint stipulation filed by Costco Wholesale Corp. and the defendants, including Visa Inc., Mastercard Inc., Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co., the parties told the court that the wholesale retailer “fully settled all of its claims against all of the defendants” but did not disclose details of the deal. . . . [read post]
14 May 2025, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 24-CV-7399 (LGD), 2025 WL 1195925, at *6–8 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:08 am by SHG
Costco Wholesale Corp., the alleged episodes of harassment did not include touching and “were few and occurred over a short span of time. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 10:34 am by David Urban
  In Costco Wholesale Corp, on September 7, 2012, the Board held that Costco’s social media policy prohibiting the posting of any statements that “damage Costco . . . defame any individual or damage any person’s reputation” violated Section 7 by chilling employee’s speech that could constitute protected concerted activity. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
., Brief of Public Knowledge et al. at 5, 9, 13–14 (Jan. 23, 2017); Brief of Costco Wholesale Corp. et al. at 20–21, 33–34 (Jan. 24, 2017); Brief for HTC Corp. et al. at 12, 17 (Jan. 24, 2017); Brief of the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors at 36 (Jan. 24, 2017); Brief of Auto Car Association et al. at 21 (Jan. 24, 2017); Brief of Intellectual Property Professors et al. at 6, 26–27 (Jan. 24, 2017). [6] Oral Argument Transcript at 3… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Mazda Motor, Costco Wholesale v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
Todd Dickinson’s comments at Bio Conference (IAM) The Charles Rivers Ventures connection – CRV stakes in RPX Corp, Thinkfire and Intellectual Ventures (IAM) Obama Administration tackling patent backlog (IP Watchdog) Patent examiners told to issue patents (IP Watchdog) More funding needed for patent granting authority (IP Watchdog) Short note on patentability of product-by-process claims – Newman J’s opinion in 1985 case In re Thorpe: Abbott v Sandoz… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Costco Wholesale Corp. (541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2008)) as potential precedent, and found both to be inapposite. [read post]