Search for: "Costello v. Costello" Results 201 - 220 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, the defendant's efforts to paint his actions in a favorable light are unavailing, as his recent averments directly contradict both his 2008 affirmation and the averments of Thomas Fatato, Striano's brother, who submitted an affidavit on the defendant's behalf (see Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990; Telfeyan v City of New York, 40 AD3d 372, 373). [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:41 am by sally
Supreme Court W (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 12 (03 March 2010) Lewis, R (on the application of) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 11 (03 March 2010) Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 10 (03 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372 (02 March 2010) NW, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 404 (03 March 2010) Costello v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 371 (02 March 2010) Lancaster,… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:35 am
Sienkiewicz (administratrix of the estate of Enid Costello decd) v Greif (UK) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] WLR (D) 321 "A claimant bringing an action in tort for exposure to asbestos dust resulting in mesothelioma was required to establish that the tortious exposure had materially increased the risk of contracting the disease. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:49 am
Nora Cellers relied upon Costello v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:24 am
This is demonstrated by the Appellate Division's decision in the Colello case.Joseph Colello was named as the defendant in a taxpayer suit, Sluys v Costello [Rockland County Index No. 3335/95]. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:23 am
Like its federal counterpart, New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b) provides that Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith.... [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990; Tejada v Jonas, 17 AD3d 448; Sanchez v City of New York, 305 AD2d 487). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:00 pm
One of the more fascinating documents in Robert Jackson's files on West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Costello v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 7:27 am
    The two Supreme Court precedents on grand jury evidence — Costello v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:44 am
R v Mayers; R v Glasgow; R v Costelloe; R v Bahmanzadeh; R v P and others [2008] EWCA Crim 1418; [2008] WLR (D) 390 “In relation to criminal proceedings there was no power, whether under the Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 or otherwise, to admit statements of anonymous witnesses made otherwise than in oral [...] [read post]