Search for: "Court Stacks" Results 201 - 220 of 4,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas issued a decision in this declaratory judgment action on the issue of whether an employee of ambulance service company, who was injured in a work-related accident while occupying her employer’s ambulance, may stack the underinsured motorists coverage limits for the six (6) ambulance vehicles that were insured under the employer’s commercial business automobile insurance policy.After reviewing the matter, Judge Nealon… [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:07 pm
As your Boston car accident lawyer can explain, courts refer to this type of driver as an uninsured motorist (UM). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:30 am
 The court noted that there was no coverage under the policy at issue given that the Plaintiff was found to have appropriately waived stacking under that policy.The court reviewed issues surrounding intra-policy stacking and inter-policy stacking questions. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 1:47 pm by Bloomberg
A big obstacle is Barack Obama’s legacy of stacking the courts with his own lifetime appointees. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:19 pm
   The court ruled that, because this case did not involve stacking issues, the Gallagher case did not apply. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:03 pm by Tom Smith
The Biden administration faces a Supreme Court stacked with three Trump nominees, solidifying a conservative majority likely to take a narrow view of the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 8:45 am
Dept. of Energy & Environmental Protection (Claim that trial court improperly dismissed administrative appeal from decision of Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection denying plaintiffs' application for two new source air permits; whether regulation (§ 22a-174-29 (b) (2)) required calculation of maximum allowable stack concentration for emissions of mercury at discharge point or property line). [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 5:23 pm by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court in advance of oral arguments in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
Just one of the 53 ranges of bound volumes of Supreme Court Records and Briefs – photo by Betty Lupinacci As I was showing off our closed stacks collection to the Law Library’s two newest reference librarians, Latia Ward and Janeen Williams, it struck me that this vast collection might make for an interesting blog post. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court found that the waiver of stacking utilized by State Farm only served to waive intra-policy stacking and not inter-policy stacking, as was at issue in this case involving separately issued insurance policies to different named insureds.The Court also held that, even though the policy at issue provided for unstacked coverage, the Gallagher v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:05 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
By Kunselman, J.), in which the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the carrier improperly denied a UIM claim of an insured who had rejected stacking on two separate policies with two different companies and, in so ruling, credited Gallagher v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:01 am by David J. Shestokas
What happens when an attorney and a guy who’s not a lawyer with a history fighting in court on his own get together to create a legal self-help book? [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:21 am by Jonathan Alper
The Supreme Court said that the wildcard exemption can be stacked upon the Constitutional exemptions for personal property and automobiles for any debtor who does not claim the homestead exemption in bankruptcy and where the homestead exemption does not otherwise impede the trustees administration of the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
According to Richard McCarthy, while courts in other states have held that anti-stacking provisions are not enforceable because they run counter to public policy, that's not likely to occur in California. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
HermansonIt has now been two months since the California Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited ruling in California v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:49 am by Barger & Wolen LLP
For a detailed analysis of the decision, please see California Supreme Court Adopts "All-Sums-With-Stacking" Rule for Continuous Injury Cases. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm by Aarti Shah
The court pointed to the Administrative Procedures Act’s (APA’s) strong deference to final agency decisions, barring any egregious errors. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:05 am by Bob Kraft
Personal injury lawyers have known for many years now that the Texas appellate courts are generally stacked in favor of corporations and insurance companies. [read post]