Search for: "Cox v. Long" Results 201 - 220 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am by Venkat
(See also the Cox case from last month: "Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment--Pennsylvania v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Cox, 343 N.W.2d 641, 643 (Minnesota Supreme Court 1984).State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The 4th Circuit took a long hard look at how and why Cox would be protected by US "safe harbor" provisions and the Court ruled against Cox on a key point: The DMCA provides a degree of protection to ISPS and other platforms that respond expeditiously to takedown requests. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Shalini Bhargava Ray
” Rodríguez and Cox note further that Congress has legislated a draconian code with the knowledge that the executive will select a small subset of the deportable population for enforcement. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Marty Lederman
  See, e.g., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
But much of Bolton’s long-term political ideology fits nicely with Trump’s current desires. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
 Thus, in Cox v Turkey  (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene R. Fidell
Section 541(f) should be a wake-up call for all the players—governmental and otherwise—to put on their long-range thinking caps. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a long opinion rejecting arguments made by major business trade groups that the new NLRB union election rules exceed the NLRB’s statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious and violate employers’ rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Supreme Court in February in Lucia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]