Search for: "Crawford v. People" Results 201 - 220 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Bryant, concerning the scope of the “ongoing emergency” standard for determining whether a victim’s statement is testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:17 am by John Floyd
  In fact, in 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Turner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm by daniel
Beginning with a California Supreme Court decision called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by SHG
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:48 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Court Rejects Discrimination Claims by Workers Laid Off So City Agency Could Meet Budget Target Crawford v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:07 am
"Local attorney Bill Groth, who represents the plaintiffs in the Indiana case, has an article on the status of the Crawford v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:14 am by Derek Muller
First, the court embraced language from its 2008 opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by admin
Justice Crawford discussed a number of interesting aspects of defamation law in British Columbia including whether hyperlinks are defamatory (referring to the recent decision in Crookes v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
I think the bigger problem is that the database approach views cases quantitatively, rather than qualitatively:  Blakely and Crawford are no more significant than Arizona v. [read post]