Search for: "Creative Photographers, Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Axanar Productions, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
TVEyes, Inc., 2015 WL 5025274 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The court found that the piece in question, a review of anti-counterfeit regulations, “possesses a creative quality, epitomised by originality and novelty” because the work was "“the result of a personal, original, new and creative elaboration of legal concepts and industry practices and of the experiences of the author”. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:31 pm
He also licensed the photograph to be used by others under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:39 am
Google Inc., 2015 WL 5449883 (11th Cir. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
Naruto, the Monkey Photographer. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Another reader stated, I represent a creator who has 8,000 creative works. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:52 am
Be aware that some photographs—even those you take yourself—may have implications under trademark law. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
Orgill, Inc., 2015 WL 4572296, No. 14-11818 (D. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:54 am
There is a cost of course, but any interested (and unregistered) photographers can find out more here.Oracle has asked a U.S. judge for permission to update its copyright lawsuit against Google Inc to include the Android operating system's current market dominance - Google's Android operating system is now the world's best-selling smartphone platform. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
Nike, Inc., No. 15-CV-113, Opinion (D. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
From Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This decision paves the way for more creative use of injunctions by claimants in libel, Article 8 and data protection claims, provided they can meet the requirements of necessity, proportionality and dissuasiveness established in the eBay case. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
“Privacy” issues generally concerned security in private correspondence through the mails, privacy in one’s home, effects, and telephone calls, rights of the press to publish gossip (and photographs) about named individuals, and access to records a government held about a named individual.[6] Whether data was “personal” – linked to a named individual – was rarely at issue in the case of addressed correspondence, private homes,… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
Raleigh America, Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
6379249 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm
In the IP world generally this is probably not big news but for small-time creative like me, the IPEC small claims track has proved to be very effective and has changed the IP scene dramatically. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
Philpot – Pro SeDefendant: Gray Television, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 4:40 am
See, e.g., Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
