Search for: "Creek v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2013, 11:39 am
Fire Creek Coal and Coke Company, 10 S.E. 288 (West Virginia, 1889) and State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
United States of America (Right of Way – Trespass)Pueblo of Pojoaque v. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
We agree with the district court’s conclusion that “Congress did not explain what it meant by ‘areas under Federal jurisdiction,’ ” and we proceed to examine whether the FWS’s interpretations offered in the United States’ amicus brief satisfy the requirements set forth in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Jewell (Land into Trust)Poarch Band of Creek Indians, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v.James Hildreth, Jr., in his official capacity as Tax Assessor of Escambia County, Alabama, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant (Indian Lands – Taxation)United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm
United States (Wednesday, Dec. 5) This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
United States (tribal trust funds)Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 7:48 am
Trade Design v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
United States (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:07 am
Further Reading: Opinion: Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm
Pulte Home Corp. v Montgomery County, 2018 WL 6204906 (4th Cir. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:46 pm
In this toxic tort litigation concerning the Pelham Bay landfill, we hold that the reports and findings of the expert epidemiologists and toxicologists satisfy the standard employed in Frye v United States, that of general acceptance in the scientific community. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
Section 2515 provides as follows:Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that… [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:15 am
MacLean then asked the court to take judicial notice of the Ninth Circuit's definition of asbestos in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
Avon v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:33 am
This equates to 407 workers injuring their back every day in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:24 am
He relies on United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
United States, as the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
