Search for: "Crews v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am by Alex Potcovaru
United States and the political question doctrine, the criminal law implications of the Trump Jr. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017;  Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
Udi Greenberg reviewed The Emergence of Globalism: Visions of World Order in Britain and the United States, 1939-1950 by Or Rosenboim. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:56 am by Michael Grossman
Basically, the FFDOs are armed as a last resort for when the flight crew and passengers are overpowered, or, unable to fight back and deadly force is the only recourse to neutralize a very dangerous threat. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:22 pm by Joseph Stacey
The punitive damages claim was based on the precedent setting 2009 Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Atlantic Sounding v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
One of the crew members, Nicomedes Martinez-Hidalgo, challenged his arrest on the ground that there was an insufficient nexus between his activities in international waters and the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:29 am by Jimmy Chalk, Sarah Grant
  In Other News… United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson this month appeared to moderate hawkish comments he made on the South China Sea at his confirmation hearing, where he suggested that the U.S. should deny China access to the islands it claims in the South China Sea. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]