Search for: "Cross v. City of Chicago" Results 201 - 220 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 3:30 pm by Doug Kendall
In dissent in a 1999 case called City of Chicago v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm by Mark Walsh
This Chicago native was a bit of a fish out of water in that sleepy burg. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  The challenge is to a City of Chicago ban on handguns that is very similar to the one the Court struck down in the Heller case, involving the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm by Ashoka Mukpo
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on Claims) CAFC:… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:21 am by David Gans
Earlier this year, in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:47 pm by Michael Froomkin
Judge Grady was a product of the Chicago outskirts, not the city. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
  Thus Heller does not squarely raise the question of whether, say, the City of Chicago may continue to ban handguns without violating the Constitution. [read post]