Search for: "Crown v. Social Security"
Results 201 - 219
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Chapter V does expressly apply to the Crown but [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 1326 (QB) (23 May 2011) : High Court refuse to vary Imogen Thomas privacy injunction despite widespread speculation of identity in social media. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
Modern governments provide social services and benefits to their citizens, like social security, Medicare, and veterans’ pensions. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
At the same time, they defend Miranda's aging and creaky rules while maintaining a dogged obliviousness to the change in the security landscape over that time at least as breathtaking as the change in social attitudes. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Germany (Case C? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Section 71 of the 1992 Act provides the only route to recovery of social security benefits overpayments to the exclusion of any common law rights. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
At the Court of Appeal their argument was based solely on Article 14 ECHR, which provides that Convention Rights should be secured without discrimination “on any grounds such as [inter alia] sex, race … national or social origin … birth or other status”. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
But Socialism and Palinism alike are masks for the true Conspiracy, which has persecuted SubGenii for possibly thousands of years. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
But Socialism and Palinism alike are masks for the true Conspiracy, which has persecuted SubGenii for possibly thousands of years. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
What Ricci v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
In Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
The Crown, in fact, did not attempt to argue this. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with Article 25 of… [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[10] During this period, the Romans enjoyed freedom from invasion and social strife to develop greater commercial ties within the Empire and with Rome's neighbors. [read post]
