Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Westbrook, decided today by the Utah Court of Appeals (written by Judge Ryan D. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
The OPM Debarment Process – Responding to an FEHBP Debarment or Suspension Action in 2024 (December 20, 2023): Most health care providers and suppliers are familiar with the fact that as a participating provider in the Medicare and / or Medicaid programs, certain criminal convictions, adverse licensure actions, and various types of prohibited conduct may subject the provider to exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs[1] by the… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
On November 22, 2023, the Departments used their statutory authority (Internal Revenue Code Section 9816(c)(9), ERISA Section 716(c)(9), and PHS Act Section 2799A-1(c)(9)) to grant extensions in the following circumstances: Disputing parties may request additional time, beyond the current business day deadline, to respond to the certified IDR entity’s requests for additional information. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
§ 101(51)(D) and 11 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Supreme Court decided otherwise. [read post]
NY Appellate Court Holds Zoning Board’s Interpretation of Zoning Code is Irrational and Unreasonable
8 Dec 2023, 9:52 am
This post was authored by Patrick Faivre, Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
By: D. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The claim was based on the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (“CCA 1974”), ss 140 A-D, alleging that the failure to disclose commission had rendered the credit relationship between the parties unfair. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
In so doing, the court relied on the Division Bench[1]Novartis AG v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
See Section 191-d(1)(c). [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:51 am
See Frye v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[v] Both Canada[vi] and New Zealand[vii] quickly claimed victory. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
