Search for: "D & W Corporation"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 8:44 am
Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:26 am
We’d go the way of horse-drawn carriages and 8-tracks. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:32 am
Brian D. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
Supp.3d 572 (D. [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:06 pm
., d/b/a Boyd Corporation (“Boyd”) improperly claimed ownership of a patent that the Regents owned and manufactured and sold technology that infringed the patent. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:03 pm
Now Edward D. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
D'Agostino, 145 F.3d 69 (1998)). [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:49 am
“[W]hen the plaintiff is a small corporation with Delaware as its long-standing corporate home (as I consider the plaintiff to be . . .), and the defendant is a national company of [SAS’s] size, see Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Gerald D. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
" When it was his turn, Carvin, one of the lawyers who argued before the Florida Supreme Court on behalf of George W. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:35 pm
Frankfort of Flowers & Frankfort, secretary Warren W. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
Some refuse to play by the rules they’d impose on others. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:01 am
").[2] See John D. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
When Mark W. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Judges Raymond W. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:20 am
Carl D. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
He said that a suit by the FDIC against a failed bank’s directors and officers “has the potential for collusion just as a suit by a corporation against its own directors and officers. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:24 pm
Appendix D explores the effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on common law fiduciary duties. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
No d. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
Among the most common criticisms are concerns that (a) the DPA/NPA regime inappropriately excuses corporate criminal behavior; (b) by continually entering DPAs and NPAs, the DOJ can shield its expansive interpretation of important statutes from judicial review; (c) the factors that determine whether the DOJ grants a DPA or NPA are not transparent; and (d) the use of corporate DPAs and NPAs leads to fewer prosecutions of culpable individuals within the corporation.… [read post]
