Search for: "D. R.C. D."
Results 201 - 220
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
And that court incorrectly found Father’s consent to the adoption was not required, pursuant to R.C. 3107.07(B)(2)(c). [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
”) R.C. 149.43(C)(2)(c) (Court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees are remedial, not punitive. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
R.C. 2152.12(B) (Discretionary bindover statute for juveniles) (Subsections D and E provide factors for and against transfer of cases from juvenile to adult court.) [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
Barker, and I’d also discussed the oral argument on that in June. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
By Stephen D. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
So I’d expect the 2nd District to come to a different decision this time around, and kick Ramey lose. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am
The Court held that a dog need not be previously designated as “dangerous” before the owner can be prosecuted under R.C. 955.22(D) for failing to confine a dangerous dog, but that the state failed to present sufficient evidence that the dog in this case was dangerous. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:58 am
Not all courts follow this approach, but I thought I’d note that some do. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
DAVIS Richard D. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
See Ohio R.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
An error of law or fact, even an egregious one, is not grounds for vacating an arbitrator’s decision under R.C. 2711.10(D), on the basis that the arbitrators exceeded their powers absent a showing of corruption, fraud, undue means or an irregularity of equal magnitude. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm
Cox, 2011 WL 5999334 (D. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
" … [E]ven if the petitioners' peaceful distribution of literature was intended to have a coercive impact on the respondent's business practices, that "d[id] not remove them from the reach of the First Amendment. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
Just because the trial court gives the advisements under R.C. 2943.031(A) does not cure a lawyer’s failure to advise his client of the immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
Bode, 2015-Ohio-1519 (“[A]n adjudication of delinquency may not be used to enhance the penalty for a later offense under R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d) when the adjudication carried the possibility of confinement, the adjudication was uncounseled, and there was no effective waiver of the right to counsel. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:47 am
Concluding Observation R.C. 2929.12(F) has been amended, effective March 11, 2013. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
I'd probably feel better about the argument if abuse of discretion was limited to the situations described in the article. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
We'd made the argument. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 11:14 am
Ohio imposes an analogous duty to the Florida’s statue in R.C. [read post]
