Search for: "D. R.C. D."
Results 201 - 220
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2014, 7:30 am
Pursuant to R.C. 2305.09 (D), Oaktree had four years from October 31, 2003 to file. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
An error of law or fact, even an egregious one, is not grounds for vacating an arbitrator’s decision under R.C. 2711.10(D), on the basis that the arbitrators exceeded their powers absent a showing of corruption, fraud, undue means or an irregularity of equal magnitude. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
Cooey to hold that R.C. 2945.39(D) (a prior version of the statute) only prohibited use of a defendant’s statement during a court-ordered examination to prove that he committed the crime for which he was facing trial. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Key Precedent R.C. 2315.21(A)(1) (“Tort action” means a civil action for damages for injury or loss to person or property but does not include a civil action for damages for breach of contract or another agreement between persons) R.C. 2315.21(D)(2)(a) (In a tort action, the court shall not enter judgment for punitive damages in excess of two times the amount of the compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff) Ohio Landlord-Tenant Act, R.C.… [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:38 am
They stipulated to allegations of abuse, under R.C. 2151.031(C), and dependency, under R.C. 2151.04(D), and received a case plan requiring them to maintain a sober lifestyle, increase their parenting knowledge, and participate in mental health assessments. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:06 am
What does the statute (R.C. 4735) call the relationship? [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm
Right call by the majority, I’d say. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am
I'd have done this job myself if I could have.All forms of life are insignificant. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Lexis 44106 (D. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 2:44 pm
This special day was sponsored by Texas Senators: Robert Deuell (R) and Leticia Van de Putte (D), and Texas Representatives: Myra Crownover (R) and Ryan Guillen (D). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Dès lors que l’article 1 du Protocole No. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:28 am
Önceki düzenlemede “pek lüzumlu ev eşyasından” söz edilirken, yeni düzenlemede lüzumlu eşyasından” bahsedilmesinden, haczedilmezliğin kapsamının genişletildiğine mi, yoksa daraltıldığına mı dair çıkarımda bulunmak oldukça zordur. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In Canada, section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states: “Any person charged with an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal”. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:24 am
See .R.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:24 am
R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Mayl, 106 Ohio St.3d 207, 833 N.E.2d 1216 (2005) that the state must show substantial compliance with R.C. 4511.19(D) and the Department of Health regulations before the test results are admissible. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
R.C. 2929.21(B)(4). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
So I’d expect the 2nd District to come to a different decision this time around, and kick Ramey lose. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:23 am
” R.C. 2901 .22(B). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Gordon-McCutchan, R.C. [read post]
