Search for: "DOE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al" Results 201 - 220 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
That statute declares, "Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent authority of a foreign government, an action or proceeding for forfeiture may be brought . . . in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
Textualism And Originalism A group of linguistics scholars describe developments in the field of corpus linguistics, which did not exist when District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling came Monday in the long-running case of Nordyke, et al., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:26 pm by Shea Denning
Julia Angwin et al., Machine Bias, ProPublica (May 23, 2016). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
” Robert Nieri, Lexology: Charity trustees’ powers of investment: Does the Butler-Sloss decision change the law? [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Funk et al. eds., 1946) (defining “sanitation” as “the removal or neutralization of elements injurious to health”). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:22 am by CSL Library News
Greely et al., Family Ties: The Use of DNA Offender Databases to Catch Offenders’ Kin, 34 J.L. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report Blog) District Court E D Texas: Ashcroft and Twombly do not require that complaint allege ‘how’ accused products infringe: WIAV Networks, LLC v 3Com Corp et al (Docket Report Blog) District Court N D California: 3-D computer graphics claims invalid under Bilski, Prometheus: FuzzySharp Technologies v 3DLabs Inc. [read post]