Search for: "DOES" Results 201 - 220 of 545,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
The majority also held that § 285 does not permit prevailing defendants to recover fees from plaintiff’s counsel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:13 pm
It does seem at least a little bit wrong that someone committed to a hospital as a sexually violent predator should go 12 full years without a trial, no? [read post]
20 May 2024, 2:11 pm by Saavedra Law Firm, PLC
But what does ‘negligence’ really mean in the eyes of the law? [read post]
The amended statute also does not specify, and it remains unsettled, whether the amendments apply retroactively “to all proceedings commenced on or after January 1, 2020,” as provided in the statute, or only to agreements entered into on or after June 6, 2024. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:49 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
It reiterated the legal standard for establishing a strict product liability claim, which does not require proving a specific defect but instead necessitates showing that the product did not perform as intended and excluding other causes for its failure. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:34 pm by sinclair
Does the law firm’s website – through its content and links – appear to be the type of expert a prospective client might need? [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:34 pm by sinclair
Does the law firm’s website – through its content and links – appear to be the type of expert a prospective client might need? [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:25 pm by jordan
Hiring a personal injury attorney does not cost you any money upfront, so hire an attorney as soon as possible after you have suffered an injury. [read post]
The challengers also argue that the FTC’s implementation of the ban implicates the Major Questions Doctrine, a statutory interpretation principle that presumes that Congress does not delegate significant political or economic issues to executive agencies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:46 am by Michael Froomkin
” In 2024 it does not. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:29 am by Lucie Gulino
Louis, the Supreme Court held that an employee bringing a discrimination claim under Title VII based on a job transfer does not need to show that she suffered significant harm with respect to the transfer, only that she suffered some harm. [read post]