Search for: "DOES 1-121" Results 201 - 220 of 1,225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
This meant that the states parties could rely on Article 12(1), the acceptance-of-jurisdiction provision described above, and not on a literal reading of the second sentence of Article 121(5). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:27 pm by Mary Whisner
Woodbury, 121 F.3d 999 (2d Cir. 2009)But see Richards v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 5:45 am by John Buhl
The easiest way to make sure that the higher top marginal rate does not fall on pass-through business investment is to provide expensing to these businesses. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:35 pm by Jake Ward
— (1) Disclosures made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:53 am
The range would have been the same using the November 1, 2001, manual but, with the November 1, 2000, manual, the range would have been 97 to 121 months. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Dennis Crouch
    if paragraph (2) does not apply, as of the actual filing date of the patent or the application for patent; or 2. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Comeau,[1] made headlines because of its sudsy subject matter: Does s. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:39 am by Kevin Jon Heller
Let me try to respond: (1) First, the word ‘binding’ that I used in my previous comment was inappropriate, or at the very least misleading. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:45 pm by Falk Metzler
The linguistic system faced by the central division of the EEUPC may affect the rights of defence (see §§ 121 and 122 of the Statement). [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am by Derek T. Muller
One is to compare the way USNWR does the ranking (separating indebtedness from percent incurring debt) with one metric that combines them. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am by Derek T. Muller
One is to compare the way USNWR does the ranking (separating indebtedness from percent incurring debt) with one metric that combines them. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
The consolidated proceeding [before the Federal Patent Court] now has case no. 1 Ni 3/13 (EP) (cf. [read post]