Search for: "DOES 1-4" Results 201 - 220 of 60,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2018, 3:30 am by Scott Harman
To be entitled to the preliminary injunction, Doe must demonstrate: (1) that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim; (2) that he is likely to suffer an irreparable injury in the absence of the injunction; (3) that the balance of equities is in his favor; and (4) that the public interest favors the grant of an injunction. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
.' Indeed, defendant has: (1) identified the [patent-in-suit]; (2) asserted he is the owner of the [patent]; (3) identified plaintiff’s competing product . . . (4) asserted that plaintiff’s 'design' . . . is 'a copy of the [product covered by the patent]'; and (5) sued others in the past for purportedly infringing on his [patent]. . . . [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:27 pm by David Friedman
Does anyone know what the right explanation is? [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:52 am
In the Supreme Court category, why does Scalia outrank Thomas, why does Roberts come in only third, and why does Alito get no respect? [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Does 1-5, has now been fully briefed, as the RIAA has filed its opposition papers, and John Doe #4 has filed his or her reply memorandum.RIAA Opposition Brief*Defendant's Reply Brief** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:51 pm by Shahram Miri
Second, the window to file a creditor claim is 4 months months. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm by Gene Quinn
According to the ITC, "Smartphone companies involved in Section 337 investigations during the first half of FY 2012 include: Apple (14), HTC (8), Motorola (4), Samsung (3), RIM (3), Nokia (3), and LG (1). [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:01 pm
I happened to notice, I was getting a lot of hits on some posts about the Certegy data breach and discovered that there is a proposed settlement in the class action law suit against them.Tim Wilson at Dark Reading pointed out that this settlement amounts to Certegy paying less than $1 per victim and wrote:Certegy Check Services is proposing to settle a class action lawsuit of last year's security breach on behalf of 8.4 million victims for about $4 million.According to a… [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:21 am by Tracy Thomas
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/83Mw6rldqwk" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:13 pm by Douglas A. Berman
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarijuanaLaw/~4/L5wYTqZ3zWc" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:53 am by Tracy Thomas
<img src="//feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/zc7EASgQPws" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:49 am by Derek Black
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/NLYkXOLHgqM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]