Search for: "DOLL V. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 11:12 am
Let’s take apart the nesting doll. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
All of the gift bags contained female blow-up dolls except for the gift bag that Player A received, which contained a male blow-up doll. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
All of the gift bags contained female blow-up dolls except for the gift bag that Player A received, which contained a male blow-up doll. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am
Best v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Vaughan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm
The first of the pair, Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
* Fusha v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:55 pm
http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/03/tafas-v-doll-fed-cir-2009-1.html 3. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
As noted in Swindell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
“ John Doll U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
DC Comics (2003) 30 Cal.4th 881 and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:31 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed this situation in Greenebaum Doll v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:59 am
’http://bit.ly/tGS73y Justice and Prosecutorial Misconduct http://nyti.ms/vKeUXj Ethnic studies in Tucson ruled illegal http://bit.ly/sDdrts US extradites woman suspected of war crimes to Bosnia NYC judge Rakoff stands behind SEC-Citigroup ruling http://bit.ly/sy6SOf New state (US) laws ban happy hour, regulate fire-breathing bit.ly/tg0UB Freedom of Expression, the ‘Occupy’ Movement and the Dismantling of Tents: Case Comment on Batty… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:24 pm
Complaint – Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:43 pm
See Tafas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
