Search for: "Davis v Kennedy" Results 201 - 220 of 442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
” John Fritze of The Baltimore Sun reports on Shapiro v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
And please note: Kim Davis never, at any point in her public statements, claimed any such power. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:26 pm
I have argued against it in articles (here and here) and in briefs and argument in Davis v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:36 pm
We may end up with a classic 5-4 division with Kennedy in the middle, along the lines of what we saw this past term in Los Angeles v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors  v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This opinion goes a very long way toward cutting back the expansive definition of "testimonial" statements - and therefore the range of evidence excluded by the Confrontation Clause - that had been stated in Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:19 pm by Joe Patrice
[The Legal Intelligencer] * Lost in Justice Kennedy's comments on solitary confinement, Davis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Mark Graber has posted on the substance of the Court's opinion in Davis v. [read post]