Search for: "Davis v. Gaines"
Results 201 - 220
of 438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
At present, MOVE has few sponsors and does not appear to be gaining any traction. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Robin Ackroyd, Financial Times v United Kingdom, Sanoma v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
The bishops’ strategy to gain the exemption was multi-faceted. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
Pentagon spokesman Captain Jeff Davis declared that U.S. forces had no reason to strike Syrian government targets. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:19 am
Ojo & Ojo v London Borough of Hackney. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
In which the Nearly Legal team gain exclusive access to a (highly) fictionalised account of one man’s inside view of legislation currently going through Parliament, insofar as it relates to housing *** Morley Peckwitch, Member of Parliament for Dunny-on-the-Wold, leaned against the bar in the Smoking Room. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 10:03 am
From State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
Having that in mind, I’ll just note that much of the exclusionary rule discussion—led by Judge Reena Raggi—seemed to turn on whether the appropriate standard was announced by the Supreme Court's decision in Davis v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 3:09 pm
Supreme Court in its 1999 Davis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Rodriguez kicked butt on the rights issue, but the remedy didn’t go nearly as well, due to Davis v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
” We were briefly excited when Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am
This view gained some momentum after the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
