Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 201 - 220
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2022, 7:21 am
” Ten days later, the Supreme Court decided Google LLC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
According to the Internal Revenue Service, for those who received a refund this year that refund averaged to about $3,000 per person. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
T is for Ticketmaster, which changed its online marketing practices following complaints to the Alberta Privacy Commissioner. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:35 am
In Shankar v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:57 am
One day, she received a notice from the Internal Revenue Service advising her that she owed taxes. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The process of making “quiet disclosures” was based upon a long-standing administrative process set out in the Internal Revenue Manual (the “IRM”). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
The ability of nonprofits to express their opinions on the issues of the day is crucial to ensuring the pluralism and diversity of viewpoints we prize as a society. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10-1553, since the Long Conference. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Thus, American trade policy was founded constitutionally on the collection of revenues from imports, and U.S. laws into the 1930s promoted the collection of revenues and severe limitations on imports, infamously in the Tariff Act of 1930, known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, that many historians consider to have been a significant contributor to global Depression. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Thus, American trade policy was founded constitutionally on the collection of revenues from imports, and U.S. laws into the 1930s promoted the collection of revenues and severe limitations on imports, infamously in the Tariff Act of 1930, known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, that many historians consider to have been a significant contributor to global Depression. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Buying Kosher or Halal products doesn’t result in a tax break, even if you’re doing it for a power higher than the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Spicy IP) Japan JPO 'super accelerated examination' allows patent in seventeen days (IP Updates) Korea Salvatore Ferragamo wins key judgment from Korea's Supreme Court in latest series of rulings in favour of trade mark owners (Managing Intellectual Property) Netherlands Comparative advertising: Unilever hits the road against Albert Hijn? [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue, Judge Hardiman’s opinion for the Court held that prior to 2004, taxpayers could establish “bona fide residence” regardless of whether their intent was to avoid tax liability or not. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
The 1939 Internal Revenue Code, which was later superseded by the 1954 Code, contained a provision with language identical to that of current Section 6501(e)(1)(A). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:36 am
(CCH) 22 (2022) (appeal filed). [3] In re Mellier’s Estate, 182 A. 388, 389 (Pa. 1936). [4] Several of the checks that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had mistakenly conceded were not included in the father’s gross estate were excluded from it. [read post]
