Search for: "Deal v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 201 - 220
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Quazzo v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
This portion of the NPRM may appear insignificant and narrow, but the Commission clearly implies its view that Section 706 provides no statutory authority to impose regulatory safeguards under any circumstances. [16] Even if the current FCC Commissioners did retain the option of regulatory intervention, an already expressed view that the wired and wireless broadband marketplace operates competitively strongly implies that a majority Republican FCC would never seek to impose… [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
This portion of the NPRM may appear insignificant and narrow, but the Commission clearly implies its view that Section 706 provides no statutory authority to impose regulatory safeguards under any circumstances. [16] Even if the current FCC Commissioners did retain the option of regulatory intervention, an already expressed view that the wired and wireless broadband marketplace operates competitively strongly implies that a majority Republican FCC would never seek to impose… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
I stand corrected. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
Within days of the BC filing, CSC Commissioner Don Head issued a statement to the media that the CSC was considering a “new model” for segregation. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Morge (FC) (Appellant) v Hampshire County Council (Respondent) on appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 608- Read judgment We cannot drive a coach-and-horses through natural habitats without a bit of soul-searching, says the Supreme Court . [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
We would not begin to say whether the Court’s characterizations of the evidence and argument from the Daubert briefs are correct, any more than we would say whether an opinion that Actos causes bladder cancer or that the drug’s sponsor should have taken some additional action is correct. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:19 am
Carr cited the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
Todd v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
The Judge handed down a judgment dealing with access to documents and anonymity (R (On the Application Of the Duke of Sussex) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin)). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 6 March 2020 Nicol J handed down a judgment dealing with disclosure issues following the PTR in the case of Depp II v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 505 (QB). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period does not… [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 10:27 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:55 am
In Mempa v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The story was judged to be inaccurate by IPSO, and a further correction has been requested. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:34 pm
In Sass v. [read post]
