Search for: "Denis Fritz" Results 201 - 214 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
., 48 AD3d 1190 (4th Dept 2008)), the courts enforced buybacks based on provisions for the disposition of shares "in any manner whatsoever" or similar wording, and in one of which (Matter of Stevens, 74 AD3d 1757 (4th Dept 2010)) the court denied enforcement for other reasons peculiar to that case. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:07 am by Jan von Hein
Should it deny the transfer to a court that is “better placed to hear the case” on the grounds that the foreign law is “different” or maybe that it even seems to be less in the interest of the child? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
His Prior Pardons May Set the Stage for More USA Today – David Jackson, John Fritze, and Kevin Johnson | Published: 12/4/2020 As President Trump weighs granting pardons to close associates – and perhaps family members and even himself – experts said he may not pay much of a political price, no matter whom the recipients are. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
The judge's determination to permit cross-examination, nonetheless, resulted in the introduction of hearsay that the jury was otherwise not permitted to hear, thereby denying defendant his constitutional right of confrontation.... [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The cringe-worthy phrase, "legal equivalent of a proctology exam," gained notoriety about ten years ago when its use by an attorney in a pre-litigation demand letter was cited by a federal judge as partial justification for a $50,000 sanction award which was later reversed on appeal. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Not Just Clarence Thomas: Lower courts facing scrutiny over ethics, disclosures, too Yahoo News – John Fritze (USA Today) | Published: 9/25/2023 Americans were able to review financial disclosure reports for all nine justices on the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal Appeals Court Expands Limits on Biden Administration in First Amendment Case MSN – Jessica Guynn and John Fritze (USA Today) | Published: 10/3/2023 The nation’s top cybersecurity defense agency likely violated the First Amendment when lobbying Silicon Valley companies to remove or suppress the spread of online content about elections, a federal appeals court ruled. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am by velvel
May 18, 2009Re: The Four Torture Memos, Eichmann, And The Obama Administration. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
In defense, the Respondent denied that it violated the Act and contended that 8 of the 13 discharged employees were supervisors within the meaning of Kentucky River. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:47 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
CSIS expert Daniel Runde will join Brock Bierman, assistant administrator for the Bureau for Europe and Eurasia at USAID; Susan Fritz, former regional mission director to Ukraine and Belarus at USAID; Frank Brown, director of the Anti-Corruption and Governance Center at the Center for International Private Enterprise; and Juela Hamati, former president at the European Democracy Youth Network, to discuss how USAID can promote democracy and government transparency internationally. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:35 am by Kevin Kaufman
” While some of these changes could have a marginally beneficial impact on the environment, in practice the elimination of most of the provisions would deny the industry normal cost recovery and subject the U.S. fossil fuel industry to additional layers of tax not faced by other industries in the U.S. or abroad. [read post]