Search for: "Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe" Results 201 - 220 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am by Andrew Hamm
Citing Arver, Day reasoned, “That Congress has the authority to raise and support armies and to make rules and regulations for the protection of the health and welfare of those composing them is too well settled to require more than the statement of the proposition. [read post]
The appellate court first held the suit was ripe for review, rejecting the County’s claim that “the controversy does not apply to a specific set of facts” as required in Pacific Legal Foundation v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Department encourages regulated institutions to review any relationships they have with the NRA or similar gun promotion organizations, and to take prompt actions to managing these risks and promote public health and safety. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust was heard on 7 June 2018. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
While a Department of Health and Human Services official initially stated that the department is not to apply the executive order to children currently in HHS custody, a statement released later Wednesday said that HHS  that it is “awaiting guidance on the matter. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:22 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The 2018 maximum deductible Health Savings Account (HSA) contribution for individuals with family coverage under a high deductible health plan (HDHP) is $6,900, rather than the lower $$6850 limitation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury originally identified as the 2018 maximum deduction amount last March. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (HHS) urging it to address “persistent” organ transplant discrimination against people with disabilities. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:52 am by Joseph Fishkin
  In the 2005 Supreme Court case of Castle Rock v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:52 am by Joseph Fishkin
  In the 2005 Supreme Court case of Castle Rock v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
His delayed cognitive processing means that, if he does, he is not able to respond in time to an instruction to “stop! [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Health & Welfare, Annuity & Pension Funds v D’Arcangelo & Co., LLP, 124 AD3d 1358, 1360 [4th Dept 2015]; Dischiavi v Calli [appeal No. 2], 68 AD3d 1691, 1693 [4th Dept 2009]; TVGA Eng’g, Surveying, P.C. v Gallick [appeal No. 2], 45 AD3d 1252, 1256 [4th Dept 2007]). [read post]