Search for: "Department of Transportation v. Land"
Results 201 - 220
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Named as defendants were the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (“DOTD”), the owner of the land on which sign was erected and its insurer, as well as the owners of the sign and their insurers. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 am
Clayton County v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
In Ladd v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs, heard 25 February 2016. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs, heard 25 February 2016. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:30 am
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs, heard 25 February 2016. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
According to the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Robinson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:34 am
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs, heard 25 February 2016. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
Coalition for Adequate Review v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm
Two Grants of Review These cases will be set for oral argument sometime this fall: Texas Department of Transportation and City of Edinburg v. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
Mitty J surveyed the various tests for proportionality, articulated in the common law (by Lord Clyde in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing [1991] 1 AC 69; in Strasbourg (Sporrong & Lönnroth v Sweden [1982] 5 EHRR 35) and James v United Kingdom [1986] 8EHRR 123. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:12 am
” At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
Juliana v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Approved by the American Bar Association in 1922, it legalized flight over the land of others unless it occurred “at such low altitudes as to interfere with the then existing use to which the land . . . or the space above the land . . . is put by the owner. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
Asset Land Investment Plc & Anor v The Financial Conduct Authority, heard 13-14 January 2016. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:13 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656, 678); the legislative intent of the statute; and the Department of Transportation's Airport Land Use Planning Handbook[1](“Handbook”). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs, heard 25 February 2016. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:30 pm
Abbott Saltonstall v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
See Eurowest Cinemas LLC v. [read post]
