Search for: "Designer Glass, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm by Jessica Mendelson
The two allegedly stole trade secrets from their employer, a glass insulation manufacturer, in order to open a competing plant in China. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 12:13 pm by Neil Melliship
This decision of the Federal Court follows closely on another loss that Bodum suffered in that Court, when it not only failed to enforce its Industrial Design Registration for a double walled glass design, but saw that Registration expunged for invalidity as well. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Employers wearing rose-tinted glasses when making wage and hour worker classification or compensable time determinations tend to overlook the significance of the burden of proof they can expect to bear should their classification be challenged. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 10:24 pm
A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:03 pm by Mandour & Associates
The system described could potentially feature headgear like special glasses designed to operate in sync with alternate-frame image sequencing. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 7:13 pm by tekEditor
The New York City-based startup has since rocketed to popularity by selling designer and prescription glasses online, for $95 — a price that now includes free shipping and returns. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hirsch Glass Co., 467 Fed.Appx. 651 (9th Cir. 2012) (coloring and color blends are uncopyrightable elements); Baby Buddies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
Zynga could have designed The Ville in innumerable different ways without copying EA ’ s original, protectable expression. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:57 am
The bead at the bottom of the double pane glass failed, letting water into the window structures and into the homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
 The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read --… [read post]