Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties" Results 201 - 220 of 1,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm by Phil Dixon
The court rejected various motions to intervene or add parties and rejected an alternate argument for the plaintiff’s standing. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am by Cinthia Macie
  Moreover, the New York Bill provides that where there is direct evidence of dominance, plaintiffs need not plead a relevant market to state a claim. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:51 am by John P. Feldman and Edward Fultz
According to the court, the facts alleged established the existence of a unilateral contract between the parties. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:51 am by John P. Feldman and Edward Fultz
According to the court, the facts alleged established the existence of a unilateral contract between the parties. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am by Eric Goldman
Second, the bill says that the new contributory claim doesn’t preempt other plaintiff claims, so trademark owners will still bring the standard statutory direct trademark infringement claim and common law contributory trademark claims (and dilution, false designation of origin, etc.). [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Entrepreneur fell within the statute’s zone of interests—alleged lost sales and reputational injury. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Characterizing VFB and Defendants as direct competitors because both make alcoholic beverages would dramatically expand the ‘zone of interest’ in which a plaintiff may sue for false advertising under the Lanham Act. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
He writes: Plaintiff Natalia Marshall, while under the age of 21, wished to purchase a handgun from a federally licensed firearms dealer and sued to challenge the constitutionality of the federal laws and regulations which prohibited her from doing so while she was 18–20 years old. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:31 am by Al Saikali
Typically, ransom payments are made directly to a threat actor’s crypto wallet address, without the direct use of an exchange. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
             The Appellate Division vacated the order and directed a genetic marker test. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Picket Fence argued that Zillow misleadingly failed to “disclose that interested shoppers would be directed to Premier Agents. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices said the state cannot limit political contributions to third-party groups because of the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“[A]n inference of a statement’s materiality based merely upon its falsity is neither so clear nor direct that it might support a burden-shifting presumption in a plaintiff’s favor. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anyway, “[a]ny publication would be deemed an advertisement if the defendant had an interest in encouraging others to purchase it,” so that definition is too broad. [read post]