Search for: "Doe v. Trump et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 5:30 am
Eddie Lee Howard et. al., decided November 26, 2012, which deals with two employees desperately attempting to circumvent that pesky arbitration clause in their covenant not to compete agreement with the employer. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:00 pm
[3] State of Utah et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
But this does not end our discussion. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
DOL filed on June 3, 2024, and Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:54 am
In People of the State of California, et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:53 pm
However, as your lawyer can explain to you, you can still probably bring a claim for violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (California Business & Professions Code 17200 et al.) and/or for penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (California Labor Code § 2698 et al.). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In sum, no matter how bad a job the Grouper does, it can hardly do worse than the current procedure. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
And relying on the defense that, by current standards, Sanders et al. are literally as far left as US politics goes simply misses the import of words. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Just because a new SG does not agree with the traditional view of the United States on a legal question, however, does not mean that the government should therefore change its legal position in court—particularly not where, as here, the Trump Administration itself pressed the traditional view before an en banc court of appeals just six months earlier (reply brief here; oral argument here); and where the new view would impose greater constraints on the… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Just because a new SG does not agree with the traditional view of the United States on a legal question, however, does not mean that the government should therefore change its legal position in court—particularly not where, as here, the Trump Administration itself pressed the traditional view before an en banc court of appeals just six months earlier (reply brief here; oral argument here); and where the new view would impose greater constraints on the… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
”14 During the Trump Administration, the FTC challenged Facebook’s (now Meta’s) acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp from 2012 and 2014, respectively. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:27 am
Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, et. al. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
Filburn et al were left untouched.) [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari (09-533) Petition for certiorari (09-547) Brief in opposition (09-533/547) Brief in opposition for the federal respondent (09-533/547) Petitioners’ reply (09-533) Petitioners’ reply (09-547) Amicus brief of members of Congress (09-533/547) Amicus brief of American Mosquito Control Association et al. (09-533/547) Amicus brief of Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation… [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Federation of Labour, et al. v. [read post]
