Search for: "Doe v. University of Michigan"
Results 201 - 220
of 986
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
The states’ briefs on the marriage question Michigan, a state that last year persuaded the Supreme Court to leave it to the state’s voters to choose to ban the use of race in public university admissions (Schuette v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Baby Girl, in which the Court held that the Indian Child Welfare Act does not bar the termination of the biological father’s parental rights. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
In Dastar v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
" Among the pallbearers: Doe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, upholding Michigan’s ban on the use of affirmative action by public universities in that state. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:29 pm
He is also Research Investigator and Adjunct Professor at the University of Michigan School of Information. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 pm
Justice Alito described a scenario in which a university faculty has authority to adopt an affirmative action policy, and then does so, but the decision could be overruled by the dean, the university president, the university’s governing board, the legislature, or even through a constitutional amendment. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Nicholas Bagley is Professor of Law at University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
And how often does it happen in general? [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
At that time it entered into a WTA with the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, 52 miles away. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
In Grutter the Court held that, “The Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the [University of Michigan] Law School’s narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
In Grutter the Court held that, “The Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the [University of Michigan] Law School’s narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:07 am
Lymtal Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
In a 1972 case, Healy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
Millard Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School; Nan D. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:30 pm
The Dobbs v. [read post]
