Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 9:20 am
According to section 19 of the Employment Insurance Regulations SOR/96-332, an employer must issue an ROE to the former employee and Service Canada. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
for “Bottoms; Caps; Hats; Jackets; Shirts; Sweatshirts; T-shirts; Tops," on the ground that the applied-for mark fails to function as a trademark under Sections 1, 2 and 45 of the Lanham Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:07 am
Main Request - Sufficiency of disclosure3.1 It is, firstly, observed that the board does not understand how the torsion field or space energy are to be measured. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:07 am
Main Request - Sufficiency of disclosure3.1 It is, firstly, observed that the board does not understand how the torsion field or space energy are to be measured. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
’” Vox Populi, 2022 USPQ2d 115, at *2-3 (quoting Eagle Crest, 96 USPQ2d at 1229). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:35 am
., 96 N.J. 336, 343 (1984). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
We reject that interpretation and hold that such a circumstance does not categorically bar the worker from recovery under section 240 (1). [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
S. 91, 96–97 (2011); see 35 U. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
[8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
It has been decided that an Examining Division (ED) does not commit a substantial procedural violation when it fails to follow the Guidelines, unless it also violates a rule or principle of procedure governed by the EPC or one of the implementing regulations (T 42/84 [9]; T 647/93 [4.1]): the failure of a department of the EPO to follow a procedure set out in the Guidelines does not qualify as a substantial procedural violation as the Guidelines are not legally binding (J… [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
” [para 96]Having provided a series of examples, the EFTA Court concluded that:“registration of a sign may only be refused on basis of the public policy exception provided for in Article 3(1)(f) of the Trade Mark Directive if the sign consists exclusively of a work pertaining to the public domain and the registration of this sign constitutes a genuine and sufficiently serious threat to a f [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:15 am
The initial revised policy, i.e. as of 2011, might be this one here]Mrs Johnson further added: “In 2010, Nigeria ranked 96 out of 132 countries, in 2011 we ranked 96 out of 125 countries and in 2013, Nigeria ranked 96 out of 142 countries. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
The FTC report does deliver some evidence. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 3:47 am
See Eagle Crest, 96 USPQ2d at 1230 (voluminous evidence of third-party use). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or service mark. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:25 pm
Owen Dean in his Handbook of SA Copyright Law (paragraph 9.2.3, on page 1-96) posits that “the America and Australian approaches to fair use are common-sense and reasonable and should be followed by the South African courts". [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:26 am
And so the Board affirmed the refusal under Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
Bunte, 96 U.S.P.Q.2d 1544, 1549 (T.T.A.B. 2010). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 2:34 pm
See MP3tunes, 1 844 F.3d at 96. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:01 am
T 755/96, OJ EPO 2000, 174, Reasons 4.1; T 798/05, Reasons 7, last two paragraphs). [read post]
