Search for: "Does I & II" Results 201 - 220 of 23,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by Josh Blackman
Likewise, with the Presidential Avoidance Canon, as I described it during the Trump years, the Court will require a clear statement that Congress intended to limit the President's power in order to avoid deciding if such a limitation on the President's power would violate Article II. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II The Catholic Herald reported AI priest avatar gets the chop in first week of digital ministry: “The ‘Fr. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 2:16 pm by Emily Vaisa
The final rule does not apply where a cause of action related to a non-compete accrued prior to the effective date. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Having done so previously, the FCC recently restored the application of Title II telecommunications service, common carrier to Internet access. https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-fast-open-and-fair-internet, ¶153-186. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Having done so previously, the FCC recently restored the application of Title II telecommunications service, common carrier to Internet access. https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-fast-open-and-fair-internet, ¶153-186. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
A person is the alter ego of an LLC only if (i) the LLC is influenced and governed by the person; (ii) there is a unity of interest and ownership such that the person and the LLC are inseparable; and (iii) adherence to the notion of separate persons would sanction a fraud or injustice. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Although this essay does not cover every possible ethics issue that can arise or all of generative AI’s law-related use cases, the overarching point is that lawyers can use these tools in many contexts if they employ appropriate safeguards and procedures. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
I explained that "receiving a 'political benefit' does not transform an otherwise legal action (like requesting an investigation) into an abuse of power. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
(i) seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:46 am by ohio-employmentlawyer
The rule defines a “non-compete clause” as: A term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a worker for, or functions to prevent a worker from: (i) seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:54 am by Emily Bremer
Nonobservance of such rules does not, per se, constitute a violation of law. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:37 am by Derek A. Colvin
With respect to a worker other than a senior executive, it is an unfair method of competition for a person:(i) To enter into or attempt to enter into a non-compete clause;(ii) To enforce or attempt to enforce a non-compete clause; or(iii) To represent that the worker is subject to a non-compete clause.(2) Senior executives. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:31 am by Abacus IP
The MOC's announcement does not specify how such prior registrations will be treated. [read post]