Search for: "Does v. Barry"
Results 201 - 220
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2018, 7:59 am
Pingue v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady police officers. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:28 pm
As noted by How Appealing here, the Fourth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
Barry Bonds' trial starts today. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
Barry Barnett Happy Friday! [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:28 am
Johnson and Davis v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
However, the court nonetheless held that this does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the charge is extravagant and unconscionable. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
Barrie, 267 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2001); United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
A Barry Friedman has pointed out in a recent Georgetown Law Journal article, the Supreme Court does not always move the law in such a prominent fashion. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
Barrie v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 11:14 am
As then-Circuit Court Judge Stephen Breyer wrote in 1983’s Barry Wright Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:30 am
Facts: This case (MacQueen v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm
But in truth they are part of a dialogue with public opinion and political leadership—and in the long run the Court does not stray far from the public. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:47 am
In Int'l Rectifier Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Plaintiff does not specify those portions of the AACWA she believes creates a private cause of action.In Suter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
The judgment in Case C-8/08 T-Mobile Netherlands BV v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 10:53 am
Derzaw, Esq., of New York; the husband was represented by Barry Elisofon, Esq., of Brooklyn. [read post]
