Search for: "Donald Verrilli, Jr." Results 201 - 220 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2023, 8:53 am by Unknown
With the aid of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, Doe filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas challenging the constitutionality of the PCAOB proceedings.Represented by former Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., and his principal adversary this week, Washington attorney Paul D. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., with the federal government on the union’s side. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:45 pm by Zoe Tillman
On July 1, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. filed a brief with the Supreme Court asking for a delay in the execution to allow Congress to take action on the treaty obligation. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:40 am by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., quickly made it clear that he would try to persuade the Court that the 1988 amendments settled the issue. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:17 am by David Ingram
Together with the Senate’s confirmation this month of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr., the action today leaves the Tax Division as the only major DOJ component without a Senate-confirmed head. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:43 am by SHG
The solicitor general, Donald B. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., talked as if he, too, perceived the case to be a severe test of public worker collective bargaining. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
When the government’s lawyer, Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:25 pm by Ilyse Schuman
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr., who represents the administration in this case, fielded pointed questions about the limits of Congress’s power to regulate individual decision-making. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., urged the Court to deny review, arguing that the change in the regulation had taken away the significance of this case for the future. [read post]