Search for: "Doyle v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm by Anna Christensen
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Representing Appellees Doyle and Margaret M. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
” Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers reports that the Court’s opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor “enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of the petitioners, Assistant to the Solicitor General Pratik Shah reiterated that the plain terms of Section 233(a) are broad enough to preclude Bivens actions even if Congress did not specifically contemplate such actions. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am by Matt Sundquist
As evidence, he notes that the Court has released only four opinions thus far, and has still not issued an opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]