Search for: "Drum, Appeal of" Results 201 - 220 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 11:26 am by Steven Koprince
SIZ-5602 (2014) involved an Army small business set-aside RFQ for the acquisition of fiber drums. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
We had a news post about the decision which was also covered in the Press Gazette, on ITV News and in The Drum. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:12 pm
City of New York, 111 A.D.3d 5, 972 N.Y.S.2d 48, 72 (2nd Dept. 2013), leave to appeal denied, 23 N.Y.3d 903, 988 N.Y.S.2d 130 (2014). [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:12 pm
City of New York, 111 A.D.3d 5, 972 N.Y.S.2d 48, 72 (2nd Dept. 2013), leave to appeal denied, 23 N.Y.3d 903, 988 N.Y.S.2d 130 (2014). [read post]
City of New York, 111 A.D.3d 5, 972 N.Y.S.2d 48, 72 (2nd Dept. 2013), leave to appeal denied, 23 N.Y.3d 903, 988 N.Y.S.2d 130 (2014). [read post]
City of New York, 111 A.D.3d 5, 972 N.Y.S.2d 48, 72 (2nd Dept. 2013), leave to appeal denied, 23 N.Y.3d 903, 988 N.Y.S.2d 130 (2014). [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:56 am by Jim Gerl
 Remember also that the limit on procedural violations is only applicable to FAPE cases.OK so now for my findings and remember that there is no claim to scientific method  (insert drum roll here.) [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:13 am by FHH Law
Anyone who plans to head straight to court has until October 14, 2014 to file a petition for review with a federal court of appeals. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
In so doing, the appeals court pointed to several instances of evidence that could lead a jury to find that the employer had violated Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:31 am by FHH Law
Federal Register publication also establishes deadlines for reconsideration, appeal, of spectrum screen Report and Order. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:48 am by SHG
  When advocates push for new crimes, they make grand appeals to emotion, raising the specter of the terrible wrongs and the harms they need to prevent. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
 In addition the coverage in the Guardian and the Independent we would single out the following Martin Hickman – whose posts from the Hacked Off Blog we have republished – and who is publishing the book “Beyond Contempt: the Inside Story of the Phone Hacking Trial” by Peter Jukes, who has tweeted the whole trial and published daily collections of those tweets on his blog – which provides a remarkable resource for the understanding and analysis of what took place… [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
Michael appealed “the partial denial of his motion, and Pamela cross-appeals the dismissal of her harmful access by computer claim. [read post]
18 May 2014, 8:16 am by FHH Law
If you’re contemplating an appeal and you do happen to have a preferred circuit, you may want to brush up on what you’ll have to do to insure that your circuit of choice makes it into the drum from which the lucky circuit will be drawn (assuming, of course, that multiple petitions are filed with different circuits). [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
They are now drumming up support for Google's very likely petition for a full-court review and Google's potential petition to the Supreme Court for writ of certiorari. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
Center 3700Decided  August 15, 2013The application on appeal was directed to an apparatus for sectioning a plastic drum container, often used for shipping liquids. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
  As you will recall from the eighteen times we’ve drummed it into your head, Hurles asks whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]