Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
In a case called United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:37 am
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. here. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 3:00 am
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113 v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:27 pm
Circuit's decision this Wednesday in Kiyemba v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:45 am
v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Justice Kavanaugh's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am
In the case of CICAD v Switzerland (Judgment of 7 June 2016)(French only), the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a judgment finding that an accusation of anti-semitism made by the applicant was unlawful did not violate Article 10. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:54 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
In 1972, in Furman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President . . . would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
9 May 2008, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
See Boston Duck Tours, LP v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:01 am
Is a goose a duck because geese resemble ducks? [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
In light of the Supreme Court's focus in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
In Symczyk v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:04 am
That is easily seen in Polly U.S.A. v. [read post]
