Search for: "Duke v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 201 - 220
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:00 am
See Walmart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
From this general study, it is then possible to begin to focus more particularly on the interpretation and application of law, focusing on the role of the courts and their frameworks for statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 12:37 am
Sexual Harassment Jury Verdict Discrimination Laws in California Dukes v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Carrier, Cabining Intellectual Property Through a Property Paradigm, 54 DUKE L.J. 1 (2004). [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:25 pm
– Last April, a divided Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
In Dukes, the Supreme Court refused to certify the class. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm
Superior Court (1990). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
And as the Supreme Court pointed out in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:52 am
” The Supreme Court’s decision in Anderson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
The BCC moved forward with the proposed rule anyway, and now our L.A. marijuana delivery attorneys are monitoring the situation, as cities appear poised to duke it out in court. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
European Court of Human RightsGawlik v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
